Re: Cool update, BUT STILL NO Solo function???!...
11 Nov 2008, 09:22shakil.. what you say is true. Usually people put things on different tracks, but then again the Fantom G has the first sequencer I have seen that lets one record different channels (internal, external, expansions) on the same track...
Either way, we still need solo functions, both in the mixer(s) and in the sequences. Additionally I absolutely think mute automation is essential. (solo automation is not)
I would also like to see a volume meter in the mixer view, specially when I activate the unborn SOLO function, so I can see the level of my Patch.
The way the mixer defaults (Part level defaults at 100) and the way the Patch levels default at the moment, quickly leads to occassional overloads and/or not enough headroom for the mastering processor, as is. I think this should be addressed by Roland.
- Jesse -
Either way, we still need solo functions, both in the mixer(s) and in the sequences. Additionally I absolutely think mute automation is essential. (solo automation is not)
I would also like to see a volume meter in the mixer view, specially when I activate the unborn SOLO function, so I can see the level of my Patch.
The way the mixer defaults (Part level defaults at 100) and the way the Patch levels default at the moment, quickly leads to occassional overloads and/or not enough headroom for the mastering processor, as is. I think this should be addressed by Roland.
- Jesse -
Jesse J / The Fantom G Facebook group - Please join!
but then I would never get any music done
my poor name, it’s been misspelled before but you destroyed it LOL